DIFFERENCE SCREENING METHODS FOR EVALUATION OF ANTI-CANCER ACTIVITY ON CELL LINE

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Oct 5, 2023
Keywords:
Anti-cancer activity Anti-tumor Cell line

Main Article Content

Sukanya Settharaksa
ino-Thai Traditional Medicine Research Center (Cooperation between Rangsit University and Harbin Institute of Technology and Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine), Faculty of Pharmacy, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand 12000
Korawan Chakree
Nutraceutical and Functional Food Research and Development Center, Prince of Songkla University, Hat-Yai Songkhla , Thailand 90112
Fameera Madaka
Sino-Thai Traditional Medicine Research Center (Cooperation between Rangsit University and Harbin Institute of Technology and Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine), Faculty of Pharmacy, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand 12000
Laksana Charoenchai
ino-Thai Traditional Medicine Research Center (Cooperation between Rangsit University and Harbin Institute of Technology and Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine), Faculty of Pharmacy, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand 12000

Abstract

In the present, cancer is one of dangerous disease in every country including Thailand, especially, bronchus, lung, colon, rectum, liver, bile duct cancer in men and breast, cervix uteri, colon and rectum cancer in women. The research about the anti-cancer is so important and has been very popular. There are many techniques and methods used in the study and one of them is the animal tissue culture techniques. The screening methods for anti-cancer activity as an essential step to the development of effective anti-cancer agents. This review in order to select the appropriate method based on the sample and type of cells. Thus after successful completion of such studied it might be possible to establish a versatile anti-cancer compound

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Settharaksa S, Chakree K, Madaka F, Charoenchai L. DIFFERENCE SCREENING METHODS FOR EVALUATION OF ANTI-CANCER ACTIVITY ON CELL LINE . Interprof J Health Sci [Internet]. 2023 Oct. 5 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];12(2):25-31. Available from: https://li05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJHS/article/view/100
Issue
Vol. 12 No. 2 (2014): July - December
Section
Review Article
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of TCI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, unless otherwise stated. Please read our Policies page for more information.

References

Alistair JL, Warren T. 2002. How bacteria could cause cancer: One step at a time. Trend in Microbial. 10: 293-299.

Andreau K, Boland S, Baeze A. 2010. Apoptosis measurement by flow cytometry. The European Network on the Hearth and Environment Impact of nanomaterials, 1-6.

Bartsch H. 2000. Studies on biomarkers in cancer etiology and prevention: a summary and challenge of 20 years of interdisciplinary research. Mutat. Res. 462: 255-279.

Borenfreund E, Puerner JA. 1985. Cytotooxicity of metals, metal-metal and metal-chelator combinination assayed in vitro. Toxicol. 39: 121-134.

Collins AR, Duthie SJ, Dobson VL. 1993. Direct enzymic detection of endogenus oxidative base damage in human lymphocyte DNA. J. Carcinog. 14: 1733-1735.

Derenzis FA, Schechtman A. 1973. Staining by neutral red and trypan blue in sequence for assaying vital and non vital cultures cells. Strain Technol. 48: 135-136.

Fairbarin DW, Olive PL, O’Neill KL. 1995. The comet assay: a comprehensive review. Mutat. Res. 339: 37-39.

Geran RI, Greenberg NH, Macdonald MM, Schumacher AM, Abbott BJ. 1972. Protocols for screening chemical agents and natural products against animal tumors and other biological systems. Cancer Chemo. Rep. 3: 1-104.

Kallioniemi OP, Wagner U, Kononen J, Sauter G. 2001. Tissue microarray technology for high-throughput molecular profiling of cancer. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10: 657-662.

Konimalla VB, Blunder M, Korn B, Soonmro SA, Jansen H, Chang W, Posner GH, Bauer R, Efferth T. 2008. Effect of artemisinins and other end peroxides on nitric oxide-related signaling pathway in Raw 264.7 mouse macrophage cells Nitric oxide. Bio. Chem. 19: 184-191.

Lee MS, Park WS, Kim YH, Ahn WG, Kwon SH, Her S. 2012. Intracellular ATP assay of Live cells using PTD-conjugated Luciferase. Sensor. 12: 15638-15637.

McGlinchey AJ. 2009. The effects of Bisphenol A on in-vitro cell viability of mammalian cell line by Neutral red assay. The Plymouth Student Scientist. 2(1): 25-31.

Mosman T. 1982. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival application to proliferation cytotoxic assay. J. Immunol. Meth. 65: 55-63.

Nation statistic office. Key statistics of Thailand 2003. Ministry of Information and Commuication Technology 2003.

Parkin DM. 2001. Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol. 2: 533-543.

Rojas E, Lopez MC, Valverde M. 1999. Single cell gel electrophoresis assay: Methodology and applications. J. Chrom. B. Biomed. Sci. Appl. 722: 225-254.

Roslin JT, Anupam B. 2011. Terpenoids as potential Chemopreventive and therapeutic agents in live cancer. World J. Hepatol. 27: 3(9): 228-233.

Sasaki YF, Nakamura T, Kawaguchi S. 2007. What is better experimental design for in vitro comet assay to detect chemical genotoxicity. Alter & Animal Life Sciences. 14: 449-504.

Siripong P, Kanokmedakul K, Piyaviriyagul S. 2006. Anti proliferative naphthoquinone esters from Rhinacanthus nasutus Kurz roots on various cancer cell. J. TCM. 23(5): 166-172.

Siriwatanametanon N, Fiebich BL, Efferth T, Pirieto JM, Heinrich M. 2010. Traditionally used Thai medicinal plants: In vitro anti-inflammatory anti cancer and antioxidant activities. J. Ethnopharmacol. 130: 196-207.

Skehan P, Storeng R, Scudireo D, Monks A, Mcmohan J, Vistica D, Warren JT, Bokesch H, Kenney S, Boyd MR. 1990. New colorimetric cytotoxic assay for anticancer-drug screening. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 82: 1107-1112.

Slater K. 2001. Cytotoxicity tests for high-throughput drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12: 70-74.

Watanabe W, Sudo K, Asawa S, Konno K, Yokota T, Shigelta S. 1995. Use of lactase dehydrogenase to evaluate the anti-viral activity against influenza A virus. J. Virol. Meth. 51: 185-192.

Weyermann J, Lochmann D, Zimmer A. 2005A practical note on the use of cytotoxicity assay Int. J. Pharm. 288: 369-376.

WHO. World Health Organization. Cervical Cancer. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/cancers/en/index.html. 2011