A Comparison of Body Measurement Method of 3D Scanning and Manual Method for Female Clothing
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
It suffices to say back in the past, for garment measurement, traditional anthropometric methods had generally been selected for fitting garment; however, 3D body scanning systems, nowadays, have been widely accepted and preferred by many scholars and researchers due to its speediness in terms of body size measurement and this could productively be as part of improving fitting garment production process. The purpose of this study was to compare 3D body scanning measurement of senseTM2 3D scanner and terminology with a traditional anthropometric method in this case, tape measurement. Concerning this research procedures, the experimental work was conducted by determining point marks based on EN 13402-3 standard on the upper part of a female mannequin and capturing mannequin images ten times by senseTM2 3D scanner and end up by using the Blender software to analysis and compare the body measurement. Based on the data collected from testing, 3D scanner had the Coefficient of Variation (CV%) range approximately 0.10-0.33%, while the measured girth results had CV% double higher than the results from 3D images. Nevertheless, values of body measure results between two methods are significantly close ranging 0.20-0.41% of error. It could be found from the results that 3D scanner was more precise than the tape when measured and this could lead to a conclusion that 3D body scanning method of female body was found to be more accurate in terms of measurement than the traditional anthropometric one.
Article Details

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Gill, S. (2016). Body scanning and its influence on garment development. In Hayes, S.G. and Venkatraman, P. (Eds.), Materials and Technology for Sportswear and Performance Apparel (pp. 311-326). New York, CRC press.
Song, H.K., and Ashdown, S.P. (2010). An exploratory study of the validity of visual fit assessment from three-dimensional scans. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 28(4), 263-278.
Petrova, A. and Ashdown, S.P. (2008). Three-dimensional body scan data analysis: Body size and shape dependence of ease values for pants' fit. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 26(3), 227-252.
Song, H.K. and Ashdown, S.P. (2015). Investigation of the validity of 3-D virtual fitting for pants. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 33(4), 314-330.
Jariyapunya, N. and Musilová, B. (2014). Analysis of Female Body Measurement in Comparison with International Standard Sizing Systems. 20th International Conference Structure and Structural Mechanics of Textiles. Technical University of Liberec, Liberec: Czech Republic.
Jariyapunya, N., Musilová, B., Geršak, J., and Baheti, S.S. (2017). The influence of stretch fabric mechanical properties on clothing pressure. Vlákna a textil, 24(2), 43-48.
Simmons, K.P. and Istook, C.L. (2003). Body measurement techniques: Comparing 3D body‐scanning and anthropometric methods for apparel applications. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 7(3), 306-322.
British Standards Institute. (2004). EN 13402-3: 2004, Size Designation of Clothes-Part 3: Measurements and Intervals. London, British Standards Institute.
Fogt., R. (2010). EN 13402: The European Clothing Standard. Retrieved from http://www.onlineconversion.com/clothing_en13402_standard.htm.
Plummer, J. (2013). Jeffplummer. Retrieved from http://www.jeffplummer.net/2013/01/introduction-to-math-behind-similarity.html.