Study of Various Carbohydrates and Sweeteners on Physicochemical Properties, Texture and Sensory Acceptance of Sandwich Bread
Keywords:
sandwich bread, carbohydrates, sweetenersAbstract
Background and Objectives: Modern fast-paced lifestyles have increased consumer demand for bakery products, particularly bread, in which sugar is a crucial ingredient governing product characteristics. However, excessive sugar consumption significantly elevates the risk of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Consequently, reduced-sugar product formulation approaches have emerged utilizing two categories of sugar replacers: digestion-resistant and fiber-like carbohydrates (polydextrose, trehalose, and isomalto-oligosaccharide) and low-calorie sweeteners (isomalt, erythritol, and isomaltulose) that exhibit low glycemic responses. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of substituting sucrose with these six sweeteners at levels of 25% and 100% on the quality of sandwich bread to determine the optimum sweetener type and substitution level.
Methodology: The control sandwich bread was prepared by mixing wheat flour (110 g), sucrose (20 g), dry yeast (2 g), milk powder (4 g), and salt (1 g). Pasteurized milk (65 mL) and unsalted butter (0.5 tablespoons) were added, followed by kneading in a dough mixer for 15 min. The dough was fermented at 28±2 °C for 1 h, degassed, placed into a baking mold (250 g capacity), and proofed for an additional 45 min. Baking was conducted at 190 °C in a closed mold for 30 min, followed by 10 min with the lid removed. The baked bread was allowed to cool, sliced to a thickness of 2.5 cm, and packaged in aluminum foil pouches. The experimental treatments followed the same procedure, but sucrose was substituted with one of six sweeteners (polydextrose, isomaltulose, isomalto-oligosaccharide, isomalt, erythritol, and trehalose) at substitution levels of 25% and 100%, resulting in 13 experimental treatments in total. The final products were evaluated for physical appearance, moisture content, water activity (aw), and color profiles (L*, a*, b* and ΔE* using the CIE system) of both the crumb and crust. Textural properties were analyzed using a texture analyzer to determine hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, and chewiness. Finally, a sensory evaluation was conducted with 100 untrained panelists using a 9-point hedonic scale to assess appearance, color, aroma, taste, and overall acceptability.
Main Results: The types and concentrations of sucrose replacers significantly affected the quality of the sandwich bread in different ways. Regarding structural properties, the control bread exhibited a fluffy crumb with uniform porosity. Isomaltulose and isomalto-oligosaccharide yielded results most comparable to the control. While erythritol and trehalose showed no distinct structural differences, 100% polydextrose resulted in a denser crumb with smaller pores. In terms of physicochemical properties, 100% substitution increased water retention, leading to higher moisture content and water activity. Polydextrose exhibited the highest values, whereas 25% isomaltulose yielded the lowest. Color analysis revealed that 25% erythritol and 25% isomaltulose produced a darker bread color. Textural profile analysis showed that 100% substitution generally increased bread hardness, with 100% erythritol yielding the highest hardness value. Conversely, 25% substitution effectively maintained crumb springiness. However, excessive substitution levels adversely affected the texture, resulting in a cohesive and chewy crumb. These findings aligned with the sensory evaluation, where 25% isomalt was outstanding in appearance and aroma, while 25% isomaltulose received the highest score for color. Notably, 25% erythritol obtained the highest scores for taste and overall acceptability, closely matching the control formulation. In contrast, 100% polydextrose received the lowest scores across all sensory attributes.
Conclusions: The application of sucrose replacers affects bread quality differently depending on the sweetener type and substitution level. Structurally, isomaltulose and isomalto-oligosaccharide provided a fluffy texture and uniform porosity most similar to the control, whereas 100% polydextrose resulted in a denser crumb with smaller pores. Physicochemically, 100% substitution increased moisture content and water activity, with polydextrose showing the highest values and 25% isomaltulose showing the lowest. Regarding color, 25% erythritol and 25% isomaltulose yielded darker colors, while 100% trehalose and 100% polydextrose produced color values similar to the control. Texturally, 100% substitution significantly increased crumb hardness. Sensory evaluation indicated that 25% erythritol achieved the highest scores for taste and overall acceptability, closely matching the control. Therefore, 25% erythritol exhibits the highest potential as a sucrose substitute in sandwich bread, followed by 25% isomalt and 25% trehalose, respectively.
References
Ahmad, A., Isherwood, C., Umpleby, M., & Griffin, B. (2020). Effects of high and low sugar diets on cardiovascular disease risk factors. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, 66(1), 18-24.
Alam, S. S., Bharti, D., Pradhan, B. K., Sahu, D., Dhal, S., Kim, N. M., & Pal, K. (2022). Analysis of the physical and structure characteristics of reformulated pizza bread. Foods, 11(13), 1979-1992.
Alam, Y. H., Kim, R., & Jang, C. (2022). Metabolism and health impacts of dietary sugars. Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis, 11(1), 20-38.
Alencar, N. M. M., Morais, E. C., Steel, C. J., & Bolini, H. M. A. (2017). Sensory characterisation of gluten-free bread with addition of quinoa, amaranth flour and sweeteners as an alternative for coeliac patients. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(4), 872-879.
AOAC. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International; 2000.
Arukwe, D. C., Ezeocha, V. C., & Okolue, S. C. (2023). Comparative analysis of bread samples produced with different sweeteners (Xylitol, Sugar, Honey and Date Powder). Nigeria Agricultural Journal, 54(2), 194-201.
Awofadeju, O. F. J., Awe, A. B., Adewumi, O. J., & Adeyemo, E. A. (2021). Influence of substituting sucrose with date palm fruit flour (DPFF) on the nutritional and organoleptic properties of bread. Croatian Journal of Food Science and Technology, 13(1), 1-6.
Beleia, A., Miller, R. A., & Hoseney, R. C. (1996). Starch gelatinization in sugar solutions. Starch-Stärke, 48(7-8), 259-262.
Chandel, V., Biswas, D., Roy, S., Vaidya, D., Verma, A., & Gupta, A. (2022). Current advancements in pectin: Extraction, properties and multifunctional applications. Foods, 11(17), 2683.
Devi, R., Singh, A., Dutta, D., & Sit, N. (2024). Physicochemical properties of barley starch and effect of substitution of wheat flour with barley starch on texture and sensory properties of bread. eFood, 5(1), 132-143.
Ding, S., & Yang, J. (2021). The effects of sugar alcohols on rheological properties, functionalities, and texture in baked products-A review. Trends in food science & technology, 111, 670-679.
Ding, J., Hu, H., Yang, J., Wu, T., Sun, X., Fang, Y., & Huang, Q. (2023). Mechanistic study of the impact of germinated brown rice flour on gluten network formation, dough properties and bread quality. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 83(1), 103217.
Do Carmo, M. M. R., Walker, J. C. L., Novello, D., Caselato, V. M., Sgarbieri, V. C., Ouwehand, A. C., & Dos Santos, E. F. (2016). Polydextrose: Physiological function, and effects on health. Nutrients, 8(9), 553-566.
Dutta, A. J., Sinha, D., Konwar, S., Pegu, B. K., & Baruah, S. (2024). Sweeteners and Sugar-Their Impact on Human Metabolic Health and Chronic Diseases. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, 21(4), 1319-1327.
Farooq, S., Shah, M. A., & Mir, S. A. (2023). Pastry. Cereal-Based Food Products, 13(2), 267-272.
Gerardo-Rodríguez, J. E., Ramírez-Wong, B., Ledesma-Osuna, A. I., Medina-Rodríguez, C. L., Ortega-Ramírez, R., & Silvas-García, M. I. (2016). Management of freezing rate and trehalose concentration to improve frozen dough properties and bread quality. Food Science and Technology (Campinas), 37(1), 59-64.
Guiné, R. P., & Florença, S. G. (2024). Development and characterisation of functional bakery products. Physchem, 4(3), 234-257.
Harinipriya, S., Ghosh, R., Prabaharan, S. R. S., & Sudha, V. (2021). pH switch over a cause for high efficiency all-aqueous CuSO4/[Fe (CN) 6] 3 redox flow battery. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(13), 19226-19244.
Higashiyama, T., & Richards, A. B. (2012). Trehalose. Sweeteners and Sugar Alternatives in Food Technology, 12(2), 417-431.
Kan, L., Oliviero, T., Verkerk, R., Fogliano, V., & Capuano, E. (2020). Interaction of bread and berry polyphenols affects starch digestibility and polyphenols bio-accessibility. Journal of Functional Foods, 68(1), 103924.
Lee, C. C., Wang, H. F., & Lin, S. D. (2008). Effect of Isomaltooligosaccharide syrup on quality characteristics of sponge cake. Cereal Chemistry, 85(4), 515-521.
Lin, S. D., Lee, C. C., Mau, J. L., Lin, L. Y., & Chiou, S. Y. (2010). Effect of erythritol on quality characteristics of reduced-calorie Danish cookies. Journal of Food Quality, 33(1), 14-26.
Liu, C., Dai, B., Luo, X., Song, H., & Li, X. (2025). Polydextrose addition improves the chewiness and extended shelf-life of chinese steamed bread through the formation of a sticky, elastic network structure. Gels, 11(7), 545.
Mäkinen, K. K. (2016). Gastrointestinal disturbances associated with the consumption of sugar alcohols with special consideration of xylitol: scientific review and instructions for dentists and other health-care professionals. International Journal of Dentistry, 2016(1), 5967907.
Martínez-Cervera, S., de la Hera, E., Sanz, T., Gómez, M., & Salvador, A. (2012). Effect of using erythritol as a sucrose replacer in making Spanish muffins incorporating xanthan gum. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 5(8), 3203-3216.
Martinez-Cervera, S., Sanz, T., Salvador, A., & Fiszman, S. M. (2014). Rheological, textural and sensorial properties of low-sucrose muffins reformulated with sucralose/polydextrose. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 56(1), 164-170.
Ministry of Public Health. (1998). Notification of the Ministry of Public Health (No. 182) B.E. 2541 Re: Nutrition Labeling. Royal Thai Government Gazette, 115(Special Part 24 Ngor). (in Thai)
Müller, D. C., Nguyen, H., Li, Q., Schönlechner, R., Schwenninger, S. M., Wismer, W., & Gänzle, M. (2021). Enzymatic and microbial conversions to achieve sugar reduction in bread. Food Research International, 143, 110296.
Müller, D. C., Schipali, S., Näf, P., Kinner, M., Miescher Schwenninger, S., & Schönlechner, R. (2022). Potential of a techno-functional sourdough and its application in sugar-reduced soft buns. Fermentation, 8(2), 42.
Regnat, K., Mach, R. L., & Mach-Aigner, A. R. (2018). Erythritol as sweetener-wherefrom and whereto. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 102(2), 587-595.
Rifna, E. J., Dwivedi, M., & Chauhan, O. P. (2022). Role of water activity in food preservation. In Advances in food chemistry: Food Components, Processing and Preservation. 39-64
Ronda, F., Gomez, M., Blanco, C. A., & Caballero, P. A. (2005). Effects of polyols and nondigestible oligosaccharides on the quality of sugar-free sponge cakes. Food Chemistry, 90(4), 549-555.
Rosell, C. M., Santos, E., & Collar, C. (2010). Physical characterization of fiber-enriched bread doughs by dual mixing and temperature constraint using the Mixolab. European Food Research and Technology, 231(4), 535-544.
Sawettanun, S., & Ogawa, M. (2022). Influences of rare sugar D-allulose on the fermentation ability of baker's yeast and the physical properties of bread. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 57(9), 6004-6015.
Sentko, A., & Willibald-Ettle, I. (2012). Isomalt. Sweeteners and Sugar Alternatives in Food Technology, 243-274.
Shyam, S., Ramadas, A., & Chang, S. K. (2018). Isomaltulose: Recent evidence for health benefits. Journal of Functional Foods, 48(1), 173-178.
Sinaga, J., Sinambela, J. L., Purba, B. C., & Pelawi, S. (2024). Gula dan Kesehatan: Kajian Terhadap Dampak Kesehatan Akibat Konsumsi Gula Berlebih. Mutiara: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(1), 54-68.
Sorndech, W., Nakorn, K. N., Tongta, S., & Blennow, A. (2018). Isomalto-oligosaccharides: Recent insights in production technology and their use for food and medical applications. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 95(1), 135-142.
Storey, D., Lee, A., Bornet, F., & Brouns, F. J. P. H. (2007). Gastrointestinal tolerance of erythritol and xylitol ingested in a liquid. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 61(3), 349-354.
Vatankhah, M., Garavand, F., Mohammadi, B., & Elhamirad, A. (2017). Quality attributes of reduced-sugar Iranian traditional sweet bread containing stevioside. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 11(3), 1233-1239.
Veena, N., Nath, S., & Arora, S. (2016). Polydextrose as a functional ingredient and its food applications: a review. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 69(3), 239-251.
Wilde, P. (2012). Foam formation in dough and bread quality. Breadmaking: Improving quality (pp. 370-399). Woodhead Publishing.
Wong, K. Y., Thoo, Y. Y., Tan, C. P., & Siow, L. F. (2022). Moisture absorption behavior and thermal properties of sucrose replacer mixture containing inulin or polydextrose. Applied Food Research, 2(1), 100089.
World Health Organization. (2015). Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. World Health Organization.
Yuliana, L. (2024). Comfort food as consumer preference in purchasing decisions. Widya Cipta: Jurnal Sekretari dan Manajemen, 8(1), 22-27.
Zhang, Y., Wang, D., Zhang, Z., Guan, H., Zhang, Y., Xu, D., & Li, D. (2024). Improvement on wheat bread quality by in situ produced dextran-A comprehensive review from the viewpoint of starch and gluten. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 23(3), e13353.
Zuorro, A. (2021). Water activity prediction in sugar and polyol systems using theoretical molecular descriptors. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(20), 11044.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Faculty of Science, Burapha University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Burapha Science Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, unless otherwise stated. Please read our Policies page for more information


