Correlation of Water Quality and Average Weight of Hybrid Catfish Cultured with Biofloc System in Earthen Ponds

Authors

  • Supavadee Koydon Faculty of Agricultural Technology and Agro-Industry, Rajamangala University of Technology, Suvarnabhumi, Ayuthaya
  • Jesada Is-haak Faculty of Agricultural Technology and Agro-Industry, Rajamangala University of Technology, Suvarnabhumi, Ayuthaya
  • Chansawang Ngamphongsai National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Science Park
  • Roongparit Jongjaraunsuk Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University

Keywords:

ammonia, biofloc, correlation, hybrid catfish , water quality

Abstract

Background and Objectives : Thailand's catfish farming system has evolved into an intensive farming system which produces substantial amounts of waste, including high levels of ammonia and nitrite in fish pond, and elevated BOD in effluent. One solution is the application of biofloc technology, which uses heterotrophic bacteria to assimilate ammonia and produce protein in microbial cells, thereby improving water quality to levels suitable for fish growth. This study aimed to determine the correlations between water quality, and average fish weight, and the addition of biofloc in hybrid catfish cultured in earthen ponds, compared to ponds without biofloc.

Methodology : The experiment was conducted in six earthen ponds, each measuring 800 m2 with a water depth of 1.2 meters and a water volume of 960 m3. Hybrid catfish, with an average weight of 2.47±0.8 g and an average length of 7.17±0.35 cm, were stocked at a density of 25,000 fish per pond. The fish were fed finely ground fresh chicken by-product once a day. The trial period lasted for six months, during which data on fish growth, survival rate, feed cost and water quality were recorded.

Main Results : With the addition of biofloc, growth rate (final average fish weight = 272.82 +3.04 g), FCR (3.20+0.01) and feed cost (19.26+0.09 Baht/ 1 kg fish) were statistically more efficient (p<0.05) compared to the ponds without biofloc. Fish feed cost was reduced by 2.1 baht/kg (9.86%). In biofloc adding ponds, water quality parameters that had a high positive correlation with average fish weight included nitrite (r= 0.893) and nitrate (r=0.788) but had a high negative correlation with transparency (r= -0.781); and a highly positive correlation with total settleable solids (r= 0.931). Additionally, water quality changes through rearing time which had a high positive correlation to biofloc adding were ammonia (r= 0.833), nitrate (r= 0.898) and BOD (r= 0.845); and a highly positive correlation with nitrite (r= 0.966) and total settleable solids (r= 0.980), in contrast, the transparency (r= -0.911) had a highly negative correlation.

Conclusions : Applying biofloc in hybrid catfish ponds increases fish yield, lowers the feed costs, and regulate ammonia and BOD levels, in accordance with the observed correlations between water quality and average fish weight.

References

Anyadike, C. C., & Ugwuishiwu, B. O. (2013). Investigation of water quality in waste fed (poultry droppings) catfish production. Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN), 3(10), 48-52.

AOAC. (2000). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists & Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

Avnimelech, Y. (1999). Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture, 176(3-4), 227-235.

Avnimelech, Y. (2007). Feeding with microbial flocs by tilapia in minimal discharge bio-flocs technology ponds. Aquaculture, 264(1-4), 140-147.

Boyd, C. E. (2015). pH, carbon dioxide, and alkalinity. Water Quality: An Introduction. (pp.153-178). New York: Springer Cham.

Browdy, C. L., Bratvold, D., Stokes, A. D., & McIntosh, R. P. (2001). Perspectives on the application of closed shrimp culture systems. In The New Wave, Proceedings of the Special Session on Sustainable Shrimp Culture, Aquaculture 2001 (pp. 20-34). The World Aquaculture Society Baton Rouge, USA.

Deswati, D., Zein, R., Suparno, S., & Pardi, H. (2023). Modified biofloc technology and its effects on water quality and growth of catfish. Separation Science and Technology, 58(5), 944-960.

Ebeling, J. M., Timmons, M. B., & Bisogni, J. J. (2006). Engineering analysis of the stoichiometry of photoautotrophic, autotrophic, and heterotrophic removal of ammonia–nitrogen in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture, 257(1-4), 346-358.

Emerenciano, M., Gaxiola, G., & Cuzon, G. (2013). Biofloc technology (BFT): A review for aquaculture application and animal food industry. Biomass now-cultivation and utilization, 12, 301-328.

Ervik, A., Hansen, P. K., Aure, J., Stigebrandt, A., Johannessen, P., & Jahnsen, T. (1997). Regulating the local environmental impact of intensive marine fish farming I. The concept of the MOM system (Modelling-Ongrowing fish farms-Monitoring). Aquaculture, 158(1-2), 85-94.

Faizullah, M., Rajagopalsamy, C. B. T., Ahilan, B., & Francis, T. (2015). Impact of biofloc technology on the growth of goldfish young ones. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(12), 1-8.

Farooqi, F. S., & Qureshi, W. U. H. (2018). Biofloc technology in aquaculture. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(6), 1905-1909.

Fauji, H., Budiardi, T. & Ekasari, J., (2018). Growth performance and robustness of African Catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell) in biofloc-based nursery production with different stocking densities. Aquaculture Research, 49(3), 1339-1346.

Furtado, P. S., Gaona, C. A., Poersch, L. H., & Wasielesky, W. (2014). Application of different doses of calcium hydroxide in the farming shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei with the biofloc technology (BFT). Aquaculture international, 22, 1009-1023.

Ghimire, R. R., Ghimire, A., Karki, D., Basyal, D., & Rai, K. B. (2023). Determination of ammonia level and its protein conversion in the water of biofloc fish farming technology. Prithvi Academic Journal, 10.

Green, B. W., & McEntire, M. E. (2017). Comparative water quality and channel catfish production in earthen ponds and a biofloc technology production system. Journal of applied aquaculture, 29(1), 1-15.

Goswami, M., Trudeau, V. L., & Lakra, W. S. (2023). Biotechnology in modern aquaculture: Innovations, advancements, and challenges. In Frontiers in Aquaculture Biotechnology (pp. 1-13). Academic Press.

Holmer, M., & Kristensen, E. (1992). Impact of marine fish cage farming on metabolism and sulfate reduction of underlying sediments. Marine ecology progress series. Oldendorf, 80(2), 191-201.

Is-haak, J., Kijjabandhit, T., Koydon, S., Ngamphongsai, C., Prasertkulsak, S., & Sinpho, P. (2024). Efficiency of biofloc application on growth, survival rate and water quality change in intensive hybrid catfish culture in indoor pond. RMUTSB Academic Journal, 12(1), 66–79.

Jiménez-Ojeda, Y. K., Collazos-Lasso, L. F., & Arias-Castellanos, J. A. (2018). Dynamics and use of nitrogen in Biofloc Technology-BFT. Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation & Legislation, 11(4), 1107-1129.

Koydon, S. (2014). Nitrogen elimination in zero waste aquaculture system. RMUTSB Academic Journal, 2(1), 66-80. (in Thai)

Koydon, S. (2018). Water quality analysis for aquaculture. Pra Nakorn Si Ayutthaya, Huntra: Fisheries Science section, Faculty of Agricultural and Argo-Industry, Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi. (in Thai)

Koydon, S. (2019). Analysis of effluent water quality of aquaculture ponds (based on the Royal Ordinance on Fisheries B.E. 2558 (2015) and related laws). Pra Nakorn Si Ayutthaya, Huntra: Fisheries Science section, Faculty of Agricultural and Argo-Industry, Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi. (in Thai)

Koydon, S., Charoenpol, A., Is-haak, J. ,& Sreejariya, P. (2019). Effect of different stocking densities on lionhead goldfish (Carasius auratus) nuresy. RMUTSB Academic Journal, 7(2),156-165. (in Thai)

Kuhn, D. D., Boardman, G. D., Lawrence, A. L., Marsh, L., & Flick Jr, G. J. (2009). Microbial floc meal as a replacement ingredient for fish meal and soybean protein in shrimp feed. Aquaculture, 296 (1-2), 51-57.

Liu, H., Li, H., Wei, H., Zhu, X., Han, D., Jin, J., & Xie, S. (2019). Biofloc formation improves water quality and fish yield in a freshwater pond aquaculture system. Aquaculture, 506, 256-269.

Mo, W. Y., Cheng, Z., Choi, W. M., Man, Y. B., Liu, Y., & Wong, M. H. (2014). Application of food waste based diets in polyculture of low trophic level fish: Effects on fish growth, water quality and plankton density. Marine pollution bulletin, 85(2), 803-809.

Munguti, J. M., Kirimi, J. G., Obiero, K. O., Ogello, E. O., Kyule, D. N., Liti, D. M., & Musalia, L. M. (2020). Aqua-feed wastes: Impact on natural systems and practical mitigations—A review. Journal of Agricultural Science, 13(1), 111.

National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standards (ACFS). (2016). Good aquaculture practices for freshwater animal farm. Thai Agricultural Standard TAS 7417 (G)-2016. Bangkok: National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standards. (in Thai)

Nie, W., Lui, W., Liu, L. H., Yu, D. H., Liu, J., & Zhou, Z. (2017). Effects of biofloc on plankton abundance in the water. The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - Bamidgeh, 1386, 11 p.

Nootong, K. (2008). Nitrogen treatment in closed system aquaculture. King Mongkut’s Agricultural Journal, 16(1), 11-20. (in Thai)

Ochieng Ogello, E., Musa, S. M., Mulanda Aura, C., Abwao, J. O., & Mbonge Munguti, J. (2014). An appraisal of the feasibility of tilapia production in ponds using biofloc technology: A review. Int. J. of Aquatic Science, 5(1), 21-39.

Piedrahita, R. H. (2003). Reducing the potential environmental impact of tank aquaculture effluents through intensification and recirculation. Aquaculture, 226(1-4), 35-44.

Pratiwi, R., Hidayat, K. W., & Sumitro. (2020). Production performance of catfish (Clarias gariepinus, Burchell, 1822) cultured with added probiotic Bacillus sp. on biofloc technology.

Sompong, U., Inkam, M., Promya, J., & Whangchai, N. (2018). Effect of biofloc technology (BFT) on red tilapia larvae aquaculture. Khon Kaen AGR. J., 46 (5), 833-842. (in Thai)

Sun, J., Li, N., Yang, P., Zhang, Y., Yuan, Y., Lu, X., & Zhang, H. (2020). Simultaneous antibiotic degradation, nitrogen removal and power generation in a microalgae-bacteria powered biofuel cell designed for aquaculture wastewater treatment and energy recovery. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(18), 10871-10881.

Suwanpakdee, S., Sriyasak, P., Chumnanka, N.,& Pimolrat, P. (2022). Result of using biofloc on growth and water quality control in Lates calcarifer culture in freshwater. Burapha Science Journal, 26(1), 413-424. (in Thai)

Tom, A. P., Jayakumar, J. S., Biju, M., Somarajan, J., & Ibrahim, M. A. (2021). Aquaculture wastewater treatment technologies and their sustainability: A review. Energy Nexus, 4, 100022.

Wijayanti, M., Amin, M., Tanbiyaskur, Jubaedah, D., Jaya, K., Ziyad, M. A., & Marsi. (2021). Aquaponic biofloc technology by swamp bacteria probiotic for Clarias catfish rearing. Journal of Aquaculture and Fish Health, 10(3), 258-270.

Zaidy, A. B., Eliyani, Y., & Ruchimat, T. (2022). Effects of feed reduction on growth performance, water quality, and hematology status of African catfish, Clarias gariepinus reared in biofloc pond system. Indonesian Aquaculture Journal, 17(1), 37-43.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-19

How to Cite

Koydon, S., Is-haak, J., Ngamphongsai, C., & Jongjaraunsuk, R. (2024). Correlation of Water Quality and Average Weight of Hybrid Catfish Cultured with Biofloc System in Earthen Ponds. Burapha Science Journal, 29(2), 763–781. Retrieved from https://li05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/buuscij/article/view/484

Issue

Section

Research Articles