Development of Reduced-Sugar Pineapple Paste and Consumer Acceptance Test

Authors

  • Phondarn Chunlakan Faculty of Food and Agricultural Technology, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University
  • Thawanrat Sumrit Faculty of Food and Agricultural Technology, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University
  • Saranya Sonmanee Faculty of Food and Agricultural Technology, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University

Keywords:

pineapple paste , sweetener, maltitol syrup

Abstract

Background and Objectives : Pineapple paste is a processed fruit product produced commercially. The main ingredients for producing pineapple paste are pineapple pulp, sugar, and glucose syrup. Therefore, this product is not suitable for health-conscious consumers who want to control sugar, which makes it unable to meet the needs of consumers. Hence, this research aims to develop a formula and production process for reduced-sugar pineapple paste and to raise the standard of community products.

Methodology : The development of optimal proportion and production process for reduced-sugar pineapple paste was divided into two parts, including (1) the proportions of two types of sweeteners (maltitol syrup and maltodextrin) were varied into four levels of maltitol syrup to maltodextrin (20:80, 30:70, 40:60 and 50:50) by weight, (2) 50% sugar content to maltitol syrup and three levels of maltodextrin (10, 15 and 20%) and (3) proportions of sugar to maltitol syrup and four levels of maltodextrin (1:1 and 1:2, 0 and 10%) by weight. The reduced-sugar pineapple paste was examined for physical and chemical quality values, including appearance, color value, texture (hardness), water activity moisture content, and sensory evaluation to select the appropriate proportion for the best quality. Product quality evaluation according to community product standards, consumer acceptance tests, and overall changes in the quality of reduced-sugar pineapple paste were studied during storage.

Main Results :The study found that the optimum proportion for producing reduced sugar pineapple paste consisted of blended pineapple pulp 71.23% maltitol syrup, 14.25% sugar, 7.12% glucose syrup, 7.12% salt, 0.21%, and citric acid 0.07%, respectively. The optimum process was picking pineapples, peeling, washing with clean water, cutting, blending, stirring (direct heating), cooling, packing, and storing in sealed packaging. The overall reduced-sugar pineapple paste products were following standard quality. The appearance of reduced-sugar pineapple paste presented a good natural color and smell of pineapple preserves, no foreign matter, which was not a used component, and the result of microorganisms checking was according to the specified criteria. The result of the consumer acceptance test by Central Location Test (CLT) of 200 people found that the average consumer rated all characteristics at a moderate to very good level, the average overall liking score was 7.60, which 90.00% of consumers accepted the product, and will purchase the products accounted for 90.00 percent. Reduced-sugar pineapple paste could be stored for more than 8 weeks in sealed packaging at room temperature.

Conclusions :Reduced-sugar pineapple paste was a processed fruit product that reduced sugar content to 80 percent by weight (compared with the original product with sugar added). Maltitol syrup was used as a sweetener substitute 40% by weight of sugar from the prototype formula. The quality reduced-sugar pineapple paste followed standard quality and obtained a good appearance, the natural color, and the aroma of pineapple preserves without foreign matter. The microorganisms’ checking result was according to the specified criteria.

References

AOAC. (2010). AOAC Official methods of analysis (Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 18th ed).International Inc. Arlington Virginia, USA.

AOAC. (2019). AOAC Official methods of analysis (Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 21th ed).International Inc. Arlington Virginia, USA.

Attabhanyo, R., Sampanvejsobha, S., & Changchut, A. (2007). Development of fruit leather for standardization and market study. Research report. The Thailand Research Fund. (in Thai)

Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) (2001). Chapter 3: Aerobic Plate Count January Edition. US Food and Drug Administration, USA.

Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) (2016). Chapter 12: Staphylococcus aureus. US Food and Drug Administration, USA.

Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) (2020). Chapter 14: Bacillus cereus. US Food and Drug Administration,USA.

Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) (2020). Chapter 4: Enumeration of Escherichia coli and the Coliform Bacteria. US Food and Drug Administration, USA.

Brusick, D.J. (2008). A Critical Review of the Genetic Toxicity of Steviol and Steviol Glycosides, Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46, S83-S91.

Chanasith, K., Paemongkol, P., Daengsangwan, N., Aphiphattarawarodom, K., Mangkornsila, N., & Pomchiangphin, S. (2015). The development product from pineapple for proceeds support student secondary education, Muang Chaiyaphum District, Chaiyaphum. Research report. Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. (in Thai)

Chompreeda, P. (2013). Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptance. Vistainterprint Co., LTD. Bangkok. (in Thai)

Choojun., S. (2012). Low energy sweetener. Chulalongkorn University press. Bangkok. (in Thai)

Dobreva, V., Hadjikinova, M., Slavov, A., Hadjikinov., D., Dobrev., G., & Zhekova., B. (2013). Functional properties of maltitol. Agricultural Science and Technology ,5, 168-172.

Dolwitthayakun., A. (2013). Food experiments. Odeon store press. Bangkok. (in Thai)

Jitbunjedkul, S., & Vonghirundacha, N. (2008) Improvement of quality and standard of preserved fruit paste. Research report. Prince of Songkla University. (in Thai)

Norsuwan, T., & Tantechai, S. (2018). Effect of maltitol on physical and chemical properties of low calorie passion fruit jam. The Proceedings of the 56th KU Annual Conference. Kasetsart University. Bangkok. (in Thai)

On-nom, N., Nualkaekul, S., & Chalermchaiwat, P. (2014). Development of Pineapple Paste Formulation Using Sweetener. Agricultural Sci. J. ,,45(2) (Suppl.),621-624. (in Thai)

Rattanapanon., N. (2002). Food chemistry. Odeon store press. Bangkok. (in Thai)

Siriwatthanasilp, A. (2021). The effect of sugar substitutes on physicochemical and microstructure properties of reduced sugar coconut milk jelly. Thesis Ph.D, Silpakorn University. (in Thai)

Thai Industrial Standards Institute Ministry of Industry. (2015). Thai community product standard, Candied fruits and vegetables, phak lae phonlamai kuan. TCPS number 35/2558. (in Thai)

Thaweeseang, N., Lueangprasert, K., & Saelim, K. (2020). Effects of Alternative Sweeteners on Physical,Chemical and Sensory Characteristics of Purple Yard Long Bean Jam. Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya Research Journal, 14(1), 91-102. (in Thai)

Weerawut, J. (1998). Pineapple and its growth physiology. Kasetsart University press. Bangkok. (in Thai)

Downloads

Published

2024-12-04

How to Cite

Chunlakan, P., Sumrit , T., & Sonmanee, S. . . (2024). Development of Reduced-Sugar Pineapple Paste and Consumer Acceptance Test. Burapha Science Journal, 29(3 September-December), 1153–1169. Retrieved from https://li05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/buuscij/article/view/507